Tag Archives: Indiana couple photography

Indianapolis Couple Photographer | A Tree Farm Session

I’ve been looking forward to this session from the moment Jacqueline messaged me. Jacqueline is a photographer, herself, and she excitedly reached out to me with her vision of a couples session at Dull’s Tree Farm. Um….. hello. I’m a Christmas FANATIC. Yes. Yes. Yes. Let’s all go to the tree farm. For EVERY shoot….

Add a comment...

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

Indianapolis Wedding Photographer | My Take on Shot Lists

Indianapolis Wedding Photographer | casey and her camera Be still, my heart. When I took this photo I knew she was looking in my direction and I quickly moved out of this spot so that I wouldn’t be a distraction, but upon editing this image (and I almost passed it right by) I realized I…

Add a comment...

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

  • Amy HohlOctober 15, 2014 - 9:57 am

    Love this! Such a good perspective on the “shot list”!ReplyCancel

  • JillOctober 15, 2014 - 10:05 am

    What a beautiful post! Your description of that photo gave me goosebumps!ReplyCancel

  • DawnOctober 15, 2014 - 2:44 pm

    Great capture!ReplyCancel

  • KatyOctober 15, 2014 - 5:12 pm

    What a great blog post, such a captivating image! <3ReplyCancel

  • Kendra MartinOctober 16, 2014 - 12:15 pm

    Really love seeing your heart in this & so thankful you shared it!!!!ReplyCancel

  • TrishaOctober 16, 2014 - 10:42 pm

    That picture is amazing a thousand times over. Thank you for sharing such an insightful perspective!!ReplyCancel

  • MeghanOctober 17, 2014 - 3:16 pm

    Such a beautifully written post, and so very true!!ReplyCancel

  • MichelleOctober 18, 2014 - 11:18 pm

    love this!ReplyCancel

  • JillOctober 20, 2014 - 9:32 am


  • Ruth BlochOctober 21, 2014 - 12:53 pm

    Love this! Love your post! And just love the story in this one!ReplyCancel

Indianapolis Engagement Photographer | Clean vs. Matte Editing

I asked this question on the Facbeook page last night, but I’m curious to hear from my blog followers, too! It’s the great debate: clean vs. matte editing. This photo is from an engagement session earlier this year (the link is in Tuesday’s blog)… and their wedding is on Saturday. EEK! As a photographer, this is…

Add a comment...

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

  • Sally salernoSeptember 25, 2014 - 7:57 am

    Tough decision but clean.ReplyCancel

  • KendraSeptember 25, 2014 - 1:23 pm


  • ChelseaSeptember 25, 2014 - 3:22 pm

    good debate! I am usually very clean, but every once in awhile an image calls for matte!ReplyCancel

  • DawnSeptember 26, 2014 - 5:27 pm

    Love both but really into matte right now.ReplyCancel

  • Jessica PaulSeptember 27, 2014 - 10:29 pm

    I’m usually for a partial matte photo- But for this – because it’s a detail photo with them blurry in the background I LOVE the matte option. It is perfect. Nicely done! Super fun idea for engagements.ReplyCancel

  • JillSeptember 29, 2014 - 8:06 am

    I love looking at other photographers who do matt but I’m clean kind a galReplyCancel

  • Tiffani JedlickaSeptember 29, 2014 - 11:24 am

    I’m somewhere in between, I love matte but a little less. Love the blog post!ReplyCancel

  • Lindsey HarwathSeptember 29, 2014 - 12:19 pm

    I have different styles depending on the type of session I’m doing. I add a little bit of matte to my newborn sessions but have a clean look for my birth images. If it’s your style and what you love, just go with it! 🙂ReplyCancel

Indianapolis Family Photographer | casey and her camera |Baby McC

Indianapolis Family Photographer | casey and her camera Coming soon to the blog…. Baby McCaman gender reveal! Stay tuned! casey and her camera is an Indianapolis Family Photographer specializing in family, couple, lifestyle, senior, and wedding photography for Indianapolis and the surrounding areas.

no comments
Add a comment...

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *